The collaboratory for the study of earthquake predictability: Achievements and priorities D Schorlemmer, MJ Werner, W Marzocchi, TH Jordan, Y Ogata, ... Seismological Research Letters 89 (4), 1305-1313, 2018 | 120 | 2018 |
Coda Q estimates in the Hong Kong region S Mak, LS Chan, AM Chandler, RCH Koo Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 24 (1), 127-136, 2004 | 99 | 2004 |
Empirical evaluation of hierarchical ground‐motion models: Score uncertainty and model weighting S Mak, RA Clements, D Schorlemmer Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 107 (2), 949-965, 2017 | 51 | 2017 |
The statistical power of testing probabilistic seismic‐hazard assessments S Mak, RA Clements, D Schorlemmer Seismological Research Letters 85 (4), 781-783, 2014 | 36 | 2014 |
Historical tsunamis in south China S Mak, LS Chan Natural Hazards 43, 147-164, 2007 | 36 | 2007 |
A comparison between the forecast by the United States National Seismic Hazard Maps with recent ground‐motion records S Mak, D Schorlemmer Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 106 (4), 1817-1831, 2016 | 35 | 2016 |
What makes people respond to “did you feel It?”? S Mak, D Schorlemmer Seismological Research Letters 87 (1), 119-131, 2016 | 30 | 2016 |
Validating intensity prediction equations for Italy by observations S Mak, RA Clements, D Schorlemmer Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 105 (6), 2942-2954, 2015 | 28 | 2015 |
An evaluation of the applicability of NGA‐West2 ground‐motion models for Japan and New Zealand S Mak, F Cotton, M Gerstenberger, D Schorlemmer Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 108 (2), 836-856, 2018 | 20 | 2018 |
Comment on “A new procedure for selecting and ranking ground‐motion prediction equations (GMPEs): The Euclidean distance‐based ranking (EDR) method” by Özkan Kale and Sinan Akkar S Mak, RA Clements, D Schorlemmer Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 104 (6), 3139-3140, 2014 | 19 | 2014 |
Measuring the performance of ground‐motion models: The importance of being independent S Mak, F Cotton, D Schorlemmer Seismological Research Letters 88 (5), 1212-1217, 2017 | 15 | 2017 |
Erratum to Validating Intensity Prediction Equations for Italy by Observations S Mak, D Schorlemmer Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 106 (2), 813-813, 2016 | 4 | 2016 |
Shortest path ray tracing in cell model with a second-level forward star S Mak, K Koketsu Geophysical Journal International 186 (3), 1279-1284, 2011 | 4 | 2011 |
Seismic analysis of the South China Region S Mak HKU Theses Online (HKUTO), 2005 | 4 | 2005 |
Surface wave scattering by the heterogeneous Nankai accretionary wedge S Mak, K Nishida, K Koketsu AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts 2011, S51C-2231, 2011 | 1 | 2011 |
“地震可预测性合作研究” 计划: 现有成就和发展重点 D Schorlemmer, MJ Werner, W Marzocchi, TH Jordan, Y Ogata, ... 世界地震译丛 51 (3), 211-223, 2020 | | 2020 |
Increasing Earthquake Forecast Testability-CSEP Future Developments. D Schorlemmer, N Hirata, F Cotton, M Gerstenberger, W Marzocchi, ... Geophysical Research Abstracts 21, 2019 | | 2019 |
Simulation-based Evaluation for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Models-a Case Study for Japan S Mak, N Hirata, H Nagao, F Cotton, D Schorlemmer EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, 15865, 2018 | | 2018 |
Reveal the Difference between Ground Motion Models under Correlated Observations S Mak Annual Meeting of the Seismological Society of America (SSA), 2017 | | 2017 |
Reply to “Comment on ‘Validating Intensity Prediction Equations for Italy by Observations’ by Sum Mak, Robert Alan Clements, and Danijel Schorlemmer” by Mathias Raschke S Mak, RA Clements, D Schorlemmer Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 106 (5), 2414-2415, 2016 | | 2016 |