High accuracy mantle convection simulation through modern numerical methods–II: realistic models and problems T Heister, J Dannberg, R Gassmöller, W Bangerth Geophysical Journal International 210 (2), 833-851, 2017 | 281 | 2017 |
Aspect: Advanced solver for problems in Earth’s convection, user manual W Bangerth, J Dannberg, R Gassmoeller, T Heister, R Myhill, J Naliboff Zenodo. https://doi. org/10.5281/zeno do, 2018 | 107 | 2018 |
Low-buoyancy thermochemical plumes resolve controversy of classical mantle plume concept J Dannberg, SV Sobolev Nature communications 6 (1), 6960, 2015 | 99 | 2015 |
The importance of grain size to mantle dynamics and seismological observations J Dannberg, Z Eilon, U Faul, R Gassmöller, P Moulik, R Myhill Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 18 (8), 3034-3061, 2017 | 84 | 2017 |
Compressible magma/mantle dynamics: 3-D, adaptive simulations in ASPECT J Dannberg, T Heister Geophysical Journal International 207 (3), 1343-1366, 2016 | 64 | 2016 |
ASPECT v2. 2.0 W Bangerth, J Dannberg, R Gassmoeller, T Heister Zenodo, 2020 | 58 | 2020 |
Major influence of plume‐ridge interaction, lithosphere thickness variations, and global mantle flow on hotspot volcanism—The example of T ristan R Gassmöller, J Dannberg, E Bredow, B Steinberger, TH Torsvik Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 17 (4), 1454-1479, 2016 | 58 | 2016 |
Chemical trends in ocean islands explained by plume–slab interaction J Dannberg, R Gassmöller Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (17), 4351-4356, 2018 | 46 | 2018 |
How plume‐ridge interaction shapes the crustal thickness pattern of the R éunion hotspot track E Bredow, B Steinberger, R Gassmöller, J Dannberg Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 18 (8), 2930-2948, 2017 | 40 | 2017 |
101 geodynamic modelling: how to design, interpret, and communicate numerical studies of the solid Earth I Van Zelst, F Crameri, AE Pusok, A Glerum, J Dannberg, C Thieulot Solid Earth 13 (3), 583-637, 2022 | 39* | 2022 |
ASPECT v2. 2.0. Zenodo W Bangerth, J Dannberg, R Gassmoeller, T Heister | 28 | 2020 |
The morphology, evolution and seismic visibility of partial melt at the core–mantle boundary: implications for ULVZs J Dannberg, R Myhill, R Gassmöller, S Cottaar Geophysical Journal International 227 (2), 1028-1059, 2021 | 27 | 2021 |
On formulations of compressible mantle convection R Gassmöller, J Dannberg, W Bangerth, T Heister, R Myhill Geophysical Journal International 221 (2), 1264-1280, 2020 | 27 | 2020 |
Iron isotope fractionation at the core–mantle boundary by thermodiffusion CE Lesher, J Dannberg, GH Barfod, NR Bennett, JJG Glessner, DJ Lacks, ... Nature Geoscience 13 (5), 382-386, 2020 | 25 | 2020 |
ASPECT v2. 0.1 [software] W Bangerth, J Dannberg, R Gassmöller, T Heister, J Austermann, ... Computational Infrastructure for Geodynamics, 2018 | 22 | 2018 |
A new formulation for coupled magma/mantle dynamics J Dannberg, R Gassmöller, R Grove, T Heister Geophysical Journal International 219 (1), 94-107, 2019 | 19 | 2019 |
Mantle convection and possible mantle plumes beneath Antarctica–insights from geodynamic models and implications for topography E Bredow, B Steinberger, R Gassmöller, J Dannberg | 16 | 2023 |
Low-buoyancy thermochemical plumes resolve controversy of classical mantle plume concept, Nat. Commun., 6, 6960 J Dannberg, SV Sobolev | 7 | 2015 |
High‐resolution mantle flow models reveal importance of plate boundary geometry and slab pull forces on generating tectonic plate motions A Saxena, J Dannberg, R Gassmöller, M Fraters, T Heister, R Styron Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 128 (8), e2022JB025877, 2023 | 5 | 2023 |
BurnMan–a Python toolkit for planetary geophysics, geochemistry and thermodynamics R Myhill, S Cottaar, T Heister, I Rose, C Unterborn, J Dannberg, ... The Open Journal, 2023 | 5 | 2023 |