Folgen
Alexandra Fleischmann
Alexandra Fleischmann
BI Data Analyst, Shop Apotheke
Bestätigte E-Mail-Adresse bei shop-apotheke.com
Titel
Zitiert von
Zitiert von
Jahr
Paradoxical effects of power on moral thinking: why power both increases and decreases deontological and utilitarian moral decisions
A Fleischmann, J Lammers, P Conway, AD Galinsky
Social Psychological and Personality Science 10, 110-120, 2019
432019
Reactions toward men who have taken parental leave: Does the length of parental leave matter?
A Fleischmann, M Sieverding
Sex Roles 72 (9-10), 462-476, 2015
382015
See feminine–Think incompetent? The effects of a feminine outfit on the evaluation of women's computer competence
A Fleischmann, M Sieverding, U Hespenheide, M Weiß, SC Koch
Computers & Education 95, 63-74, 2016
262016
You can leave your glasses on: Glasses can increase electoral success
A Fleischmann, J Lammers, JI Stoker, H Garretsen
Social Psychology 50, 110-120, 2019
15*2019
Abstract thinking increases support for affirmative action
A Fleischmann, P Burgmer
Sex Roles 82 (7), 493–511, 2020
142020
Situational factors shape moral judgements in the trolley dilemma in Eastern, Southern and Western countries in a culturally diverse sample
B Bago, M Kovacs, J Protzko, T Nagy, Z Kekecs, B Palfi, M Adamkovic, ...
Nature Human Behaviour, 1-16, 2022
132022
More threatening and more diagnostic: How moral comparisons differ from social comparisons.
AD Fleischmann, Alexandra, Lammers, Joris, Diel, Kathi, Hofmann, Wilhelm ...
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2021
102021
Gender disparities in middle authorship
A Fleischmann, L Van Berkel
Social Psychological Bulletin 16 (1), 1-22, 2021
62021
Prevalence and frequency of self-management strategies among female cancer survivors: The neglected roles of social relations and conscious living
M Sieverding, N Ungar, A Fleischmann, M Lee, H Zhang, M Mohnke, ...
Supportive Care in Cancer 28 (2), 607–616, 2020
62020
Power and moral thinking
A Fleischmann, J Lammers
Current Opinion in Psychology 33, 23-27, 2020
52020
Kant be compared: People high in social comparison orientation make fewer—not more—deontological decisions in sacrificial dilemmas
A Fleischmann, J Lammers, P Conway, AD Galinsky
Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2020
42020
Moral thinking across the world: Exploring the influence of personal force and intention in moral dilemma judgments
B Bago, B Aczel, Z Kekecs, J Protzko, M Kovacs, T Nagy, R Hoekstra, M Li, ...
PsyArXiv, 2019
32019
Why people hate congress but love their own congressperson: an information processing explanation
J Lammers, E Pauels, A Fleischmann, AD Galinsky
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2021
22021
Disentangling the factors behind shifting voting intentions: the bandwagon effect reflects heuristic processing, while the underdog effect reflects fairness concerns
J Lammers, M Bukowski, A Potoczek, A Fleischmann, W Hofmann
Journal of Social and Political Psychology 10 (2), 2022
12022
Publisher Correction: Situational factors shape moral judgements in the trolley dilemma in Eastern, Southern and Western countries in a culturally diverse sample
B Bago, M Kovacs, J Protzko, T Nagy, Z Kekecs, B Palfi, M Adamkovic, ...
Nature human behaviour 6 (6), 897-898, 2022
2022
Männer können nicht zuhören, Frauen können nicht einparken? Psychologische Forschung zu Geschlechterunterschieden und -stereotypen [Editorial Gender Special Issue]
A Fleischmann, A Gast
Das In-Mind Magazin 10 (1), 2019
2019
Das System kann den Vorgang jetzt nicht ausführen. Versuchen Sie es später erneut.
Artikel 1–16