Renke Schmacker
Renke Schmacker
Verified email at diw.de - Homepage
Title
Cited by
Cited by
Year
Social image concerns and welfare take-up
J Friedrichsen, T König, R Schmacker
Journal of Public Economics 168, 174-192, 2018
92018
Die Angst vor Stigmatisierung hindert Menschen daran, Transferleistungen in Anspruch zu nehmen
J Friedrichsen, R Schmacker
DIW Wochenbericht 86 (26), 455-461, 2019
52019
Welfare stigma in the lab: Evidence of social signaling
J Friedrichsen, T König, R Schmacker
WZB Discussion Paper, 2016
52016
Do prices and purchases respond similarly to soft drink tax increases and cuts?
R Schmacker, S Smed
Economics & Human Biology 37, 100864, 2020
32020
Earn More Tomorrow: Overconfident Income Expectations and Consumer Indebtedness
A Grohmann, L Menkhoff, C Merkle, R Schmacker
SFB Rationality & Competition, Discussion Paper, 2019
22019
Eine Softdrinksteuer zur fiskalischen Konsumsteuerung
R Schmacker
DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus, 2016
12016
Sin Taxes and Self-Control
R Schmacker, S Smed
Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin, 2020
2020
Protecting the Ego: Motivated Information Selection and Updating
A Castagnetti, R Schmacker
2020
Zuckersteuern können zu einer gesünderen Ernährung beitragen: Kommentar
R Schmacker
DIW Wochenbericht 87 (12), 248-248, 2020
2020
Fair Procedures with Naive Agents: Who Wants the Boston Mechanism?
T König, D Kübler, L Mechtenberg, R Schmacker
2019
Fear of Stigmatization Prevents Individuals from Claiming Benefits
J Friedrichsen, R Schmacker
DIW Weekly Report 9 (26/27), 215-220, 2019
2019
Softdrinksteuer: Proportionale Steuer ist der vielversprechendste Ansatz
R Schmacker
Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW), 2018
2018
The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later.
Articles 1–12