Social image concerns and welfare take-up J Friedrichsen, T König, R Schmacker Journal of Public Economics 168, 174-192, 2018 | 52* | 2018 |
Do prices and purchases respond similarly to soft drink tax increases and cuts? R Schmacker, S Smed Economics & Human Biology 37, 100864, 2020 | 22 | 2020 |
Die Angst vor Stigmatisierung hindert Menschen daran, Transferleistungen in Anspruch zu nehmen J Friedrichsen, R Schmacker DIW Wochenbericht 86 (26), 455-461, 2019 | 17 | 2019 |
Protecting the ego: Motivated information selection and updating A Castagnetti, R Schmacker European Economic Review 142, 104007, 2022 | 14 | 2022 |
Earn More Tomorrow: Overconfident Income Expectations and Consumer Indebtedness A Grohmann, L Menkhoff, C Merkle, R Schmacker SFB Rationality & Competition, Discussion Paper, 2019 | 8 | 2019 |
Sin Taxes and Self-Control R Schmacker DIW Berlin Discussion Paper, 2020 | 3 | 2020 |
Fair procedures with naive agents: Who wants the Boston mechanism? T König, D Kübler, L Mechtenberg, R Schmacker Discussion Paper, 2019 | 2 | 2019 |
Confidence and college applications: Evidence from a randomized intervention R Hakimov, R Schmacker, C Terrier WZB Discussion Paper, 2022 | 1 | 2022 |
Zuckersteuern können zu einer gesünderen Ernährung beitragen: Kommentar R Schmacker DIW Wochenbericht 87 (12), 248-248, 2020 | 1 | 2020 |
Eine Softdrinksteuer zur fiskalischen Konsumsteuerung R Schmacker DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus, 2016 | 1 | 2016 |
Preferences for Sin Taxes T König, R Schmacker CESifo Working Paper, 2022 | | 2022 |
Fairness in Matching Markets: Experimental Evidence T König, L Mechtenberg, D Kübler, R Schmacker | | 2021 |
Soft Drink Taxation and Habit Formation R Schmacker | | 2020 |
Essays in Behavioral Public Economics R Schmacker | | 2020 |
DIW Weekly Report 26+ 27 20 19 J Friedrichsen, R Schmacker | | 2019 |
Softdrinksteuer: Proportionale Steuer ist der vielversprechendste Ansatz R Schmacker Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW), 2018 | | 2018 |