Hannah Dames
Hannah Dames
Verified email at cs.uni-freiburg.de - Homepage
Cited by
Cited by
When does a reasoner respond: Nothing follows?
M Ragni, H Dames, D Brand, N Riesterer
CogSci, 2640-2546, 2019
Modeling human syllogistic reasoning: The role of “no valid conclusion”
N Riesterer, D Brand, H Dames, M Ragni
Topics in cognitive science 12 (1), 446-459, 2020
Intentional forgetting in artificial intelligence systems: Perspectives and challenges
IJ Timm, S Staab, M Siebers, C Schon, U Schmid, K Sauerwald, L Reuter, ...
Joint German/Austrian Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Künstliche …, 2018
Searching vs. Browsing—The Influence of Consumers’ Goal Directedness on Website Evaluations
H Dames, G Hirschfeld, T Sackmann, MT Thielsch
Interacting with Computers 31 (1), 95-112, 2019
A meta-analysis of conditional reasoning
M Ragni, H Dames, PN Johnson-Laird
Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, 151-156, 2019
The Role of Feedback and Post-Error Adaptations in Reasoning
H Dames, C Schiebel, M Ragni
Retrieved from osf. io/dy3gr, 2020
Analyzing the Differences in Human Reasoning via Joint Nonnegative Matrix Factorization
D Brand, N Riesterer, H Dames, M Ragni
Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2020
Die Sicht des Kunden: Unterschiede in der Website-Bewertung
H Dames, T Sackmann, MT Thielsch
Mensch und Computer 2017-Usability Professionals, 2017
On the Interdependence of Post-Error Control and Memory
H Dames, CU Pfeuffer
PsyArXiv, 2021
Multinomial Processing Models for Syllogistic Reasoning: A Comparison.
H Dames, JO von Hartz, M Kantz, N Riesterer, M Ragni
CogSci, 2018
The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later.
Articles 1–10