Follow
Robbie C.M. van Aert
Robbie C.M. van Aert
Verified email at tilburguniversity.edu - Homepage
Title
Cited by
Cited by
Year
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
Open Science Collaboration
Science 349 (6251), aac4716, 2015
71572015
Many Labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across samples and settings
RA Klein, M Vianello, F Hasselman, BG Adams, RB Adams Jr, S Alper, ...
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 1 (4), 443-490, 2018
7362018
Response to comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science”
CJ Anderson, Š Bahník, M Barnett-Cowan, FA Bosco, J Chandler, ...
Science 351 (6277), 1037-1037, 2016
6352016
Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking
JM Wicherts, CLS Veldkamp, HEM Augusteijn, M Bakker, R Van Aert, ...
Frontiers in psychology, 1832, 2016
6052016
Meta-analysis using effect size distributions of only statistically significant studies.
MALM Van Assen, R van Aert, JM Wicherts
Psychological methods 20 (3), 293, 2015
2762015
Conducting Meta-Analyses Based on p Values: Reservations and Recommendations for Applying p-Uniform and p-Curve
RCM van Aert, JM Wicherts, MALM van Assen
Perspectives on Psychological Science 11 (5), 713-729, 2016
1732016
Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis
RCM Van Aert, JM Wicherts, MALM Van Assen
PloS one 14 (4), e0215052, 2019
1532019
Reporting guidelines for meta‐analysis in economics
T Havránek, TD Stanley, H Doucouliagos, P Bom, J Geyer‐Klingeberg, ...
Journal of Economic Surveys 34 (3), 469-475, 2020
1312020
Why publishing everything is more effective than selective publishing of statistically significant results
MALM Van Assen, RCM Van Aert, MB Nuijten, JM Wicherts
PLoS one 9 (1), e84896, 2014
1152014
Distributions of p-values smaller than. 05 in psychology: what is going on?
CHJ Hartgerink, RCM Van Aert, MB Nuijten, JM Wicherts, ...
PeerJ 4, e1935, 2016
622016
The effect of publication bias on the Q test and assessment of heterogeneity.
HEM Augusteijn, R van Aert, MALM van Assen
Psychological methods 24 (1), 116, 2019
592019
Correcting for publication bias in a meta-analysis with the p-uniform* method
RCM van Aert, MALM van Assen
MetaArXiv, 2018
582018
Examining reproducibility in psychology: A hybrid method for combining a statistically significant original study and a replication
R Van Aert, MALM Van Assen
Behavior Research Methods 50 (4), 1515-1539, 2018
392018
Bayesian evaluation of effect size after replicating an original study
RCM Van Aert, MALM Van Assen
PloS one 12 (4), e0175302, 2017
372017
Same data, different conclusions: Radical dispersion in empirical results when independent analysts operationalize and test the same hypothesis
M Schweinsberg, M Feldman, N Staub, OR van den Akker, RCM van Aert, ...
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 165, 228-249, 2021
362021
A new justification of the Hartung‐Knapp method for random‐effects meta‐analysis based on weighted least squares regression
RCM Van Aert, D Jackson
Research synthesis methods 10 (4), 515-527, 2019
332019
BFpack: Flexible Bayes factor testing of scientific theories in R
J Mulder, X Gu, A Olsson-Collentine, A Tomarken, F Böing-Messing, ...
arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.07728, 2019
232019
Multistep estimators of the between‐study variance: The relationship with the Paule‐Mandel estimator
RCM van Aert, D Jackson
Statistics in medicine 37 (17), 2616-2629, 2018
172018
Puniform: Meta-analysis methods correcting for publication bias
RCM van Aert
R package version 0.0 3, 2017
172017
Longitudinal associations of psychological resilience with mental health and functioning among military personnel: A meta-analysis of prospective studies
E van der Meulen, PG van der Velden, RCM van Aert, ...
Social Science & Medicine 255, 112814, 2020
162020
The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later.
Articles 1–20