Folgen
Jeremy Gelman
Jeremy Gelman
Bestätigte E-Mail-Adresse bei unr.edu
Titel
Zitiert von
Zitiert von
Jahr
Rewarding dysfunction: Interest groups and intended legislative failure
J Gelman
Legislative Studies Quarterly 42 (4), 661-692, 2017
392017
Mixing messages: How candidates vary in their use of Twitter
J Gelman, SL Wilson, C Sanhueza Petrarca
Journal of information technology & politics 18 (1), 101-115, 2021
162021
Losing to Win: Why Congressional Majorities Play Politics Instead of Make Laws
J Gelman
University of Michigan Press, 2020
162020
The opportunistic president: how us presidents determine their legislative programs
J Gelman, G Wilkenfeld, ES Adler
Legislative Studies Quarterly 40 (3), 363-390, 2015
132015
Measuring congressional partisanship and its consequences
J Gelman, SL Wilson
Legislative studies quarterly 47 (1), 225-256, 2022
122022
Partisan intensity in congress: Evidence from Brett Kavanaugh’s supreme court nomination
J Gelman
Political Research Quarterly 74 (2), 450-463, 2021
92021
In pursuit of power: Competition for majority status and Senate partisanship
J Gelman
Party Politics 25 (6), 782-793, 2019
42019
If congress is so dysfunctional, why is its staff so busy? a congressional fellow’s perspective
J Gelman
PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (2), 494-495, 2018
42018
Why Bills Fail: Electioneering with the Legislative Agenda.
JR Gelman
42016
Will Kavanugh’s confirmation affect the midterms? Here’s what showed up on social media
S Wilson, J Gelman
Washington Post, 2018
3*2018
Ask and You May Receive: Senators’ Strategies for Securing Particularistic Benefits
J Gelman
Congress & the Presidency 48 (2), 123-146, 2021
12021
The Deaths of Ideas in Congress
J Gelman
Political Research Quarterly, 10659129241246003, 2024
2024
Insecure majorities will ensure that the Senate remains gridlocked for the foreseeable future
J Gelman
USApp-American Politics and Policy Blog, 2018
2018
Das System kann den Vorgang jetzt nicht ausführen. Versuchen Sie es später erneut.
Artikel 1–13